Appearances can be deceptive
Globular clusters are roughly spherical collections of extremely old stars, and around 150 of them are scattered around our galaxy. Hubble is one of the best telescopes for studying these, as its extremely high resolution lets astronomers see individual stars, even in the crowded core. The clusters all look very similar, and in Hubble’s images it can be quite hard to tell them apart – and they all look much like NGC 411, pictured here.
And yet appearances can be deceptive: NGC 411 is in fact not a globular cluster, and its stars are not old. It isn’t even in the Milky Way.
NGC 411 is classified as an open cluster. Less tightly bound than a globular cluster, the stars in open clusters tend to drift apart over time as they age, whereas globulars have survived for well over 10 billion years of galactic history. NGC 411 is a relative youngster — not much more than a tenth of this age. Far from being a relic of the early years of the Universe, the stars in NGC 411 are in fact a fraction of the age of the Sun.
The stars in NGC 411 are all roughly the same age, having formed in one go from one cloud of gas. But they are not all the same size. Hubble’s image shows a wide range of colours and brightnesses in the cluster’s stars. These tell astronomers many facts about the stars, including their mass, temperature and evolutionary phase. Blue stars, for instance, have higher surface temperatures than red ones.
The image is a composite produced from ultraviolet, visible and infrared observations made by Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3. This filter set lets the telescope “see” colours slightly further beyond red and the violet ends of the spectrum.
Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA

Appearances can be deceptive

Globular clusters are roughly spherical collections of extremely old stars, and around 150 of them are scattered around our galaxy. Hubble is one of the best telescopes for studying these, as its extremely high resolution lets astronomers see individual stars, even in the crowded core. The clusters all look very similar, and in Hubble’s images it can be quite hard to tell them apart – and they all look much like NGC 411, pictured here.

And yet appearances can be deceptive: NGC 411 is in fact not a globular cluster, and its stars are not old. It isn’t even in the Milky Way.

NGC 411 is classified as an open cluster. Less tightly bound than a globular cluster, the stars in open clusters tend to drift apart over time as they age, whereas globulars have survived for well over 10 billion years of galactic history. NGC 411 is a relative youngster — not much more than a tenth of this age. Far from being a relic of the early years of the Universe, the stars in NGC 411 are in fact a fraction of the age of the Sun.

The stars in NGC 411 are all roughly the same age, having formed in one go from one cloud of gas. But they are not all the same size. Hubble’s image shows a wide range of colours and brightnesses in the cluster’s stars. These tell astronomers many facts about the stars, including their mass, temperature and evolutionary phase. Blue stars, for instance, have higher surface temperatures than red ones.

The image is a composite produced from ultraviolet, visible and infrared observations made by Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3. This filter set lets the telescope “see” colours slightly further beyond red and the violet ends of the spectrum.

Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA


Posted 1 year ago with 144 notes
Tagged:AstronomyastrophysicsscienceNASAhubble space telescopeglobular clusterstarsspacecosmosgalaxy

  1. orangeisthenewcat reblogged this from spaceplasma
  2. taylabcrzy reblogged this from spaceplasma
  3. skaterboytae reblogged this from sagansense
  4. tacodilesupreme reblogged this from curious-nugget
  5. curious-nugget reblogged this from yoursecretloveaffair
  6. yoursecretloveaffair reblogged this from spaceplasma
  7. reality-is-an-allusion reblogged this from ne0ndreams
  8. fuckyesphysics reblogged this from set-out-tea-for-moriartysherlock
  9. set-out-tea-for-moriartysherlock reblogged this from spaceplasma
  10. stay-bumba reblogged this from oddlilgirl
  11. rawrgorg3ous reblogged this from lah-tte
  12. ohhawtdayummmm reblogged this from lah-tte
  13. lah-tte reblogged this from ne0ndreams
  14. xmalice-in-wonderlandx reblogged this from helwolf
  15. shit-happins reblogged this from oddlilgirl
  16. oddlilgirl reblogged this from froglieb
  17. eilishfitz reblogged this from froglieb
  18. froglieb reblogged this from helwolf
  19. justsimple1 reblogged this from iidropkickbabies
  20. waxadelica reblogged this from psychedelic420s
  21. kim-yuri reblogged this from spaceplasma
  22. sixelamarie reblogged this from megacosms
  23. plutoc reblogged this from megacosms
  24. iidropkickbabies reblogged this from sweetmandee
  25. madamovariess reblogged this from bwhere
  26. goddammitdev reblogged this from psychedelic420s
  27. perambulatelove reblogged this from hinduhearthrob
  28. hinduhearthrob reblogged this from bwhere
  29. psychedelic420s reblogged this from bwhere
  30. shadeof-blind reblogged this from bwhere
  31. bwhere reblogged this from megacosms
  32. whoisjoe reblogged this from eccentric-girls
  33. eccentric-girls reblogged this from ne0ndreams
  34. sweetmandee reblogged this from cosmic-space
  35. cosmic-space reblogged this from ne0ndreams